The Happy Orca
 
Home
About Me
Cosmetics Guide
Toiletries Guide
Household Guide
Contact
An alphabetical guide to Cosmetic products...
Quick Links: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Key
Companies that test on animals "if the law requires it"
Companies yet to respond or who have ambiguous policies (i.e. Those that do not clearly state that both the finished products and ingredients are not tested on animals)
Companies that state that their products and ingredients are not tested on animals
Companies that operate a Fixed Cut Off Date policy
Brand (click for link to full policy) Summary of brand policy Parent Company (click for link to full policy) Summary of parent policy 
Almay "ALMAY relies on the judgment of pharmacological, toxicological and medical experts. We use non-animal alternative test methods as well as the safety histories of formulations and ingredients to determine product safety." Revlon Via email: "Revlon does not participate in animal testing and has not since June 1989. To determine product safety, Revlon relies on the judgment of pharmacological, toxicological, and medical experts, as well as non-animal alternative testing methods, and the past safety history of formulations and ingredients. When necessary, Revlon uses a small number of animal derived materials for which there are no vegetable or synthetic equivalents. Among these are collagen, elastin, hydrolyzed silk, beeswax, lanolin, and milk ingredients. Revlon does not manufacture a product that contains pork by-products."
Anna Sui See Parent Company Proctor & Gamble "P&G will only conduct research involving animals in the development and evaluation of our products as a last resort, when all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted. In those situations where such research is necessary (e.g., when required by law), we will ensure the humane treatment of all animals and will meet or exceed all legal requirements regarding animal welfare."
Aveda  "[Aveda] are animal friendly (Aveda does not conduct animal testing on its products and actively supports the development of alternative methods to animal testing)" The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
Avon

"Avon does not conduct animal testing on any of its products or raw ingredients and does not require that suppliers of raw ingredients and finished products produced for Avon conduct animal testing on our behalf. Avon will conduct animal testing when required by law, at the request of government health or medical authorities, and only after having first attempted to persuade the requesting authority to accept non-animal test data."

N/A - Private Company  
Bare Escentuals / Bare Minerals Via Email: "We have never tested our products on animals and will continue not to do so. We also do not work with any manufacturers that conduct animal testing. The vast majority of BareMinerals products do not contain animal derived ingredients. We do use Carmine, a natural colourant, in some shades of eye, cheek and lip products. Some of our products may contain Beeswax. Some or our brushes are natural hair brushes, the majority of which are goat hair. Please note that no animals are harmed in the process of making our brushes." Shiseido " If all alternative methods to animal testing were completed to confirm the safety of cosmetic ingredients, no animal testing would be required. However, at the current scientific level, not all alternative methods have been established or authorized, and in order to guarantee customer safety and security, there are now cases in which safety tests involving animal testing are necessary according to either the law or product safety assurances."
Barry M

"Barry M Cosmetics have never tested their finished products or ingredients on animals or engaged another company to do so on our behalf. All of our products are suitable for vegetarians but some contain animal by-products (like Beeswax) making them unsuitable for Vegans."

N/A - Private Company  
Beauty Without Cruelty "In 1963, Beauty Without Cruelty was founded in England by the trustees of BWC Charitable Trust, an animal welfare organization. Its goal was to manufacture and distribute natural, color cosmetics that were NOT tested on animals (as was the norm) and did NOT contain any animal ingredients. The driving force behind the project was Katherine Long, a dedicated, life-long animal welfare activist, a cosmetician, and a vegetarian."  N/A - Private Company  
Benefit "Benefit Cosmetics does not perform or allow animal testing on bulk or finished products." LVMH (Moët Henness,y Louis Vuitton, S.A. - PDF) "[The] various brands of the LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics business group no longer use animal testing to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products"
BM Beauty "We're proud to say that our products have the stamp of approval from the BUAV. BM Beauty make up is also free from bismuth oxychloride, parabens, nano particles and synthetic dyes and fragrances." N/A - Private Company  
Bobbi Brown "No. Bobbi Brown is committed to the elimination of animal testing. We are equally committed to consumer health and safety, and bringing to market products that comply with applicable regulations in every country in which our products are sold... We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels." The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
The Body Shop

"The Body Shop has always believed passionately that animals should not be used for cosmetic testing. We have never tested our products on animals. Similarly, we insist that all our suppliers have not tested their ingredients on animals for cosmetic purposes. We comply with the strict requirements of the Humane Cosmetics Standard created by the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection. Our policy and standards in this area were praised by the BUAV in 2008. In the same year we won the RSPCA Good Business Award for a second time, for our commitment to animal welfare."

L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Boots "No animal testing of any kind is undertaken or commissioned by Boots or its subsidiary businesses. We recognise that until satisfactory replacements are available, some animal tests will be carried out by others to meet regulatory requirements and protect public health. These safety tests
sometimes involve ingredients used in products manufactured and sold by subsidiary businesses. We would like to see an end to all animal tests and we give financial and technical support to the development and introduction of alternative forms of safety testing"
   
Bourjois Via Email: "I  am  pleased to be able to report that several years ago we completed our long  range  programme  designed  to  eliminate  testing on animals without compromising  in any way the safety and quality of our products and various legislative requirement in this regard. The  results obtained enabled us to cease all animal tests in all phases of our  research  and development work as well as in the manufacture of all of our products.  This included all tests carried out on our behalf by outside laboratories."    
Burberry  Awaiting Response    
Burts Bees "We commit to the highest standards of free trade and working conditions in the sourcing of our products. We also pledge to never test our ingredients or products on animals." Clorox "Using nonanimal product safety evaluations is the norm at Clorox and animal testing is the exception — the vast majority of our products reach the market without testing on animals… We do not conduct or cause third-parties to conduct any animal testing on products, raw materials or components of finished products unless required by federal or local regulators… We will not license our name or the name of any of our brands to formulations of products that have been tested on animals… We will not acquire or purchase product formulations or other products for use in our consumer products that have been tested on animals (except when such testing was done to meet the requirements of federal, state, local or other applicable regulations)."
By Terry Via Email: "We confirm to you that our finished products are not tested on animals, as requested by Comestic Directive 76/768/CEE. we apply the REGULATION (EC) No. 1223/2009, our cosmetic products have not been the subject of animal testing and ingredients have not been an animal experiment using a method other than an alternative method after such alternative method has been validated and adopted at Community level, taking due account of the development of validation within the OECD." N/A - Private Company  
Cacharel See Parent Company L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Chanel "CHANEL shares the legitimate concern of its customers in terms of nature protection. The Brand does not test on animals." N/A - Private Company  
Chantecaille "All Chantecaille products are fragrance-free. No animal testing. No animal derivatives. No lanolin or mineral derivatives." N/A - Private Company  

Christian Dior

Via Email: "In 1989, our laboratories made public their decision not to use animals in the testing of products to be put on the market. The double demand, consumer safety and respect of animal life, has encouraged our laboratories to carry on research projects with universities and to participate in the development and validation of alternative methods to animal testing." LVMH (Moët Henness,y Louis Vuitton, S.A. - PDF) "[The] various brands of the LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics business group no longer use animal testing to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products"
Clarins "During the development of each product, rigorous tests are carried out exclusively in test tubes to establish effectiveness and safe use. In fact, Clarins denounced animal testing in 1987 in favour of alternative testing methods on cell cultures and reconstituted human skin. These very reliable and effective methods have enabled us to achieve considerably more through research." N/A - Private Company  
Clinique Via Email: "We have always been against animal testing. Recently, the global regulatory climate has become more stringent and cosmetic companies are being asked to further validate the human and environmental safety of their ingredients and products. We are equally committed to consumer health and safety. Given these increased requirements for ensuring the safety of cosmetic ingredients, animal testing may be legally necessary under certain circumstances when no non-animal alternative is available or acceptable to governmental/health authorities. Be assured that we will make every effort to avoid having ingredients tested on animals, and will take all practical and available steps to see that existing or non-animal test data is used instead. However, if ultimately this is required in order for the company to sell its products, we will, of course, comply with the law."
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
Collection 2000 See Parent Company Vivalis

"Vivalis Ltd, or any third party acting on our behalf, has never conducted any animal testing on any Vivalis brand products... Vivalis Ltd, or any third party acting on our behalf, will not in the future conduct animal tests on any Vivalis brand products... The product Safety Assessment we perform on all products we manufacture includes all relevant data (including human data) and does not require that we conduct or have conducted on our behalf, any animal tests on Vivalis brand products."

Diesel See Parent Company L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Dr Hauschka Via Email: "This “cut off date policy” would most certainly not apply to us because we have never tested any of our products or ingredients on animals." WALA Heilmittel Awaiting Parent Company response.
Elizabeth Arden Via Email: "The Elizabeth Arden Company shares your concern about the use of animals in safety testing and is committed to eliminating the need. Contrary to what you may have read or been told, we do not sponsor or perform any animal studies on our product formulations. This has been our policy since 1988. To avoid the use of tests on animals, our product development work involves materials with well-established safety records and the use of extensive ingredient databases. Our product safety testing also includes the use of non-animal studies, computer modeling and studies with human volunteers. As a result, we can take great pride in our product safety record. Further, our ultimate goal is to eliminate the necessity for animal testing through our active support of our industry's sharing of scientific data and sponsorship of research programs to develop and validate non-animal alternatives for product testing."
N/A - Private Company  
Essential Care "All the ingredients we use, except for the emulsifier beeswax, are plant-derived. All Essential Care products are handmade in small batches to ensure maximum freshness. Our products are tested on a panel of willing human volunteers and NEVER on animals. We ensure that our raw materials suppliers follow the same policy." N/A - Private Company  
Essie See Parent Company L'Oreal "L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."
Estée Lauder "The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing. We are equally committed to consumer health and safety, and bringing to market products that comply with applicable regulations in every country in which our products are sold. We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels. Estée Lauder fully supports the development and global acceptance of non-animal testing alternatives. To this end, the Company works extensively with the industry at large and the global scientific community to research and fund these alternatives. To find out more information on animal testing in the cosmetics industry, please visit the Cosmetic Toiletries & Perfumery Associations website - WWW.THEFACTSABOUT.CO.UK"     
Giorgio Armani "No. Giorgio Armani Beauty does not use animals to test its products, and does not have animal testing conducted on its behalf by anyone else. Instead, we ensure product safety through state-of-the-art. All Giorgio Armani Beauty testing are made on human volunteers." L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Givenchy "No. None of our products are tested on animals." LVMH (Moët Henness,y Louis Vuitton, S.A. - PDF) "[The] various brands of the LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics business group no longer use animal testing to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products"
GOSH "We do not carry out animal testing whatsoever, nor do we commission others to do so, either in Denmark or anywhere else in the world. We are also totally against the animal testing of our finished products."    
Green People  "Green People are and always have been totally opposed to any cruelty to animals.  Since starting the Green People in 1997, we have operated to the following principles: -
• We have never carried out or commissioned animal testing of any raw material, cosmetic ingredient or finished product. All Green People products are tested on human volunteers.
• We do not and will not use ingredients that have been made by manufacturers who carry out or commission animal testing of cosmetic ingredients."
N/A - Private Company  
Guerlain Via Email: "Since 1989, Guerlain do not perform any test on animals for the products they put on the market, long before the official ban in 2004 in the European Union. Guerlain believes that ending animal testing is a benefit for all: consumers, animal welfare and industry. LVMH Group, to which Guerlain belongs, played a leading role in the development of alternative methods engaging important funds into the “Fund for Alternatives to Animal Testing” in Washington D.C., as well as, in France, in the Opal program. This approach permitted to Guerlain to guarantee answers to the double demand, consumer safety and respect of animal life. The cosmetic industry is committed by the European cosmetics directive to stopping animal testing for substances used for cosmetics in acute toxicity studies in March 2009 and in repeated-dose toxicity studies in 2013. Furthermore in 2011, the European Commission will issue a report to assess the progress made to date about validation of alternatives to animal testing and the difficulties encountered, the challenges for 2013 are considerable. Like we always did, Guerlain, as a responsible industry, respect the European legislation as we respect regulations worldwide. The development of alternatives methods is a real scientific challenge and Guerlain is committed to continue to make all efforts in order to respect legislation, consumer safety and animal life."
LVMH (Moët Henness,y Louis Vuitton, S.A. - PDF) "[The] various brands of the LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics business group no longer use animal testing to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products"
Hard Candy "The Hard Candy collection has never and will never test on animals.  It’s a policy we had in place during the development of the brand.  We feel strongly about cruelty-free products and will continue with that practice indefinitely. There are options to test cosmetics for the safety of humans while avoiding testing on any kind of animals and we will take that route every time regardless of the cost." Nu-World Beauty No information available at present.
Hugo Boss Fragrance See Parent Company Proctor & Gamble "P&G will only conduct research involving animals in the development and evaluation of our products as a last resort, when all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted. In those situations where such research is necessary (e.g., when required by law), we will ensure the humane treatment of all animals and will meet or exceed all legal requirements regarding animal welfare."
Jean Paul Gaultier Via Email: "[Our] company does not test its products on animals. One of our constant requirement is obviously to guarantee a safely use of our products to our consumers. This is the reason why our company takes an active part in European programmes for the development of several alternative testing methods, which aim at optimally evaluating the innocuousness of our products." Shiseido " If all alternative methods to animal testing were completed to confirm the safety of cosmetic ingredients, no animal testing would be required. However, at the current scientific level, not all alternative methods have been established or authorized, and in order to guarantee customer safety and security, there are now cases in which safety tests involving animal testing are necessary according to either the law or product safety assurances."
Jemma Kidd Via Email: " Jemma Kidd Make Up is fully opposed to the use of animal testing to assess the safety of its cosmetic products. None of our products are tested on animals and none of our suppliers conduct animal testing on our behalf either. N/A - Private Company  
Kenzo See Parent Company LVMH (Moët Henness,y Louis Vuitton, S.A. - PDF) "[The] various brands of the LVMH Perfumes and Cosmetics business group no longer use animal testing to evaluate the safety of cosmetic products"
Lacoste See Parent Company Proctor & Gamble "P&G will only conduct research involving animals in the development and evaluation of our products as a last resort, when all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted. In those situations where such research is necessary (e.g., when required by law), we will ensure the humane treatment of all animals and will meet or exceed all legal requirements regarding animal welfare."
Lancôme See Parent Company L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Laura Mercier "We do not, nor have we ever, tested our products on animals. We also do not contract outside companies to test on animals for us." Gurwitch Products Awaiting Response
Lime Crime Awaiting Response N/A - Private Company  
Lipstick Queen Awaiting Response N/A - Private Company  
Liz Earle "Animal Testing - we never do it." Avon "Avon does not conduct animal testing on any of its products or raw ingredients and does not require that suppliers of raw ingredients and finished products produced for Avon conduct animal testing on our behalf. Avon will conduct animal testing when required by law, at the request of government health or medical authorities, and only after having first attempted to persuade the requesting authority to accept non-animal test data."
L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

   
MAC See Parent Company The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
Marks & Spencer (own brand) "We don’t test any of our M&S beauty or household products on animals. But we wanted to go further than this. As part of our Plan A commitments, we guarantee that none of the individual ingredients in our beauty or household products is tested on animals either, starting from a fixed cut-off date of January 2006.This covers more than 1,200 products and, more importantly, their individual ingredients, from lavender laundry liquid to tea tree face wipes. All these products have the stamp of approval from BUAV, (British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection). You'll see their leaping bunny logo on pack, which means you'll know that what you're buying is "animal-friendly."" N/A - Private Company  
Max Factor See Parent Company Proctor & Gamble "P&G will only conduct research involving animals in the development and evaluation of our products as a last resort, when all reasonable alternatives have been exhausted. In those situations where such research is necessary (e.g., when required by law), we will ensure the humane treatment of all animals and will meet or exceed all legal requirements regarding animal welfare."
Maybelline Awaiting Response L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Medusa Make Up "[We do not test on animals], we are PETA certified!" N/A - Private Company  
Miss Sporty See Parent Company Coty Via Email: "Coty voluntarily ceased testing finished cosmetic products on animals in 1991, long before the official European ban on such testing in 2004.  Coty has been actively involved for many years in the research and development of alternatives to animal testing... We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients. Our safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients is based on the use of recognized alternatives to animal testing, the use of existing safety data and, increasingly, the sharing of such data from and with other industries."
nails inc. Via Email: " We can confirm that we test no product or raw materials on animals.  To the best of our knowledge this is also the position of all of our industrial suppliers. "  N/A - Private Company  
NARS Via Email: "Nars does not test on animals, nor do we have any other parties, including our suppliers, conduct animal testing on our behalf. Nars uses only the highest quality ingredients which have a proven safety record and are widely used in the cosmetics industry." Shiseido " If all alternative methods to animal testing were completed to confirm the safety of cosmetic ingredients, no animal testing would be required. However, at the current scientific level, not all alternative methods have been established or authorized, and in order to guarantee customer safety and security, there are now cases in which safety tests involving animal testing are necessary according to either the law or product safety assurances."
Neals Yard

"We don't test any of our products on animals and never have. We prefer to rely on our deep botanical knowledge of herbs and flowers and to use our technical expertise to make great skin and body care products, tinctures and herbal remedies. Instead of tests on rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and rats, we employ an independent company that uses human volunteers to trial new products, to make sure they're safe and effective... We use standards developed by leading animal protection campaign groups and our continued commitment to animal welfare has been recognised by campaigners from PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, and the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection who awarded us a 'golden' rabbit and by the RSPCA who commended our stance on the issue."

N/A - Private Company  
New CID Cosmetics

Via Email: "New CID Cosmetics do not test products or ingredients on animals. Since the company originated in 2005, none of the manufacturers have tested either the ingredients or products on animals."

N/A - Private Company  
New York Color See Parent Company Coty

Via Email: "Coty voluntarily ceased testing finished cosmetic products on animals in 1991, long before the official European ban on such testing in 2004.  Coty has been actively involved for many years in the research and development of alternatives to animal testing... We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients. Our safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients is based on the use of recognized alternatives to animal testing, the use of existing safety data and, increasingly, the sharing of such data from and with other industries."

OPI "OPI is committed to improving lives with high quality products while safeguarding the health of our customers. We also recognize we have a responsibility to protect the well-being of animals. Therefore, OPI is committed to seeking out and using raw ingredients in our products that have not been tested on animals. Further, we avoid supporting raw material suppliers that use animal testing as part of their overall scheme of safety testing... OPI is committed to a policy of no animal testing on any of our products" Coty Via Email: "Coty voluntarily ceased testing finished cosmetic products on animals in 1991, long before the official European ban on such testing in 2004.  Coty has been actively involved for many years in the research and development of alternatives to animal testing... We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients. Our safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients is based on the use of recognized alternatives to animal testing, the use of existing safety data and, increasingly, the sharing of such data from and with other industries."
Philosophy  "We absolutely do not conduct animal testing with philosophy products. We are fully committed to using alternatives to animal testing to ensure the safety of our products." Coty Via Email: "Coty voluntarily ceased testing finished cosmetic products on animals in 1991, long before the official European ban on such testing in 2004.  Coty has been actively involved for many years in the research and development of alternatives to animal testing... We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients. Our safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients is based on the use of recognized alternatives to animal testing, the use of existing safety data and, increasingly, the sharing of such data from and with other industries."
Pureology See Parent Company L'Oreal  
Ralph Lauren See Parent Company L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Revlon Via Email: "Revlon does not participate in animal testing and has not since June 1989. To determine product safety, Revlon relies on the judgment of pharmacological, toxicological, and medical experts, as well as non-animal alternative testing methods, and the past safety history of formulations and ingredients. When necessary, Revlon uses a small number of animal derived materials for which there are no vegetable or synthetic equivalents. Among these are collagen, elastin, hydrolyzed silk, beeswax, lanolin, and milk ingredients. Revlon does not manufacture a product that contains pork by-products."
N/A - Private Company  
Rimmel See Parent Company Coty

Via Email: "Coty voluntarily ceased testing finished cosmetic products on animals in 1991, long before the official European ban on such testing in 2004.  Coty has been actively involved for many years in the research and development of alternatives to animal testing... We do not perform, nor do we ever commission any third parties on our behalf to perform, animal testing on our products or ingredients. Our safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients is based on the use of recognized alternatives to animal testing, the use of existing safety data and, increasingly, the sharing of such data from and with other industries."

Shiseido " If all alternative methods to animal testing were completed to confirm the safety of cosmetic ingredients, no animal testing would be required. However, at the current scientific level, not all alternative methods have been established or authorized, and in order to guarantee customer safety and security, there are now cases in which safety tests involving animal testing are necessary according to either the law or product safety assurances."    
Shu Uemura See Parent Company L'Oreal

"L’Oréal has not used animals to test its finished products since 1989, except in the case where national legislation requires it. This is the case in certain countries where L’Oréal operates and in those locations regulations require testing using animals before substances can be registered for commercial use."

Sisley  "No. Sisley does not test its products on animals. In order to guarantee the complete innocuousness required of its products, Sisley carries out numerous tests that notably call for the use of so-called alternative methods on cellular cultures (a substitution method for animal tests). These studies are completed by product tolerance tests performed on voluntary users (usage test), in an independent clinical expertise institute, approved by the Ministry for Health, under dermatological control. Likewise, our efficacy tests are performed by this same institute and also call for voluntary users."
N/A - Private Company  
Sleek Makeup "[We] confirm that we do not test any of our products on animals during any phase of the product’s development, and therefore declare that all cosmetic products comply with the EEC Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC that are not tested on animals."
N/A - Private Company  
Smashbox "Smashbox products are cruelty-free, meaning that they are never tested on animals. Many of our brushes are made from animal hair, however no animals are harmed in this process." The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
Space NK Via Email: "Space NK Apothecary Ltd does not test or commission any testing on animals for cosmetics purposes of the SPACE NK or SPACENK brands." N/A - Private Company  
Superdrug "We and our own brand manufacturers do not commission animal testing on any Superdrug own brand products or ingredients. Our own brand cosmetics, toiletry and household ranges have not been tested on animals by us or by our own brand manufacturers." N/A - Private Company  
Tom Ford   See Parent Company The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. "No. The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. is committed to the elimination of animal testing… We do not conduct animal testing on our products or ingredients, nor ask others to test on our behalf, except when required by law. We evaluate our finished products in clinical tests on volunteer panels."
Une Awaiting Response    
Urban Decay

Via Email: "We are under new ownership but they basically only own us. We still use the same animal and cruelty free companies we use to make our products. We hope to lead the way for L’Oreal and show them they do not need to test on any animals."

L'Oreal PLEASE NOTE THAT L'OREAL HAVE NOW BOUGHT URBAN DECAY. CLICK ON THIS LINK TO READ ABOUT THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT.
Victoria Jackson Awaiting Response    
Yves Saint Laurent "Yves Saint Laurent does not carry out any tests on animals. In order to check the quality and tolerance of our products, we carry out in-votro tests on biological matrices or cell cultures. Once we are certain of their non-cytotoxicity, they are tested on healthy volunteers in a hospital environment, under dermatological control, with a minimum of one hundred people."    

Back to top

Website Design by
Cookson Factory